- Side-by-side LaTeX editing, with re-build on save (you can set the autosave interval if you want).
- Forward and inverse search.
- Parsing of the log file, with buttons to jump to corresponding place in tex file and pdf file.
- Preview uses high-resolution color png's, so it will work in browsers that don't have any support for pdf.
- The command to LaTeX your document is customizable.
- The build process should run LaTeX, bibtex, and sagetex automatically if the log file says they need to be run; otherwise you can click a button to force bibtex or sagetex to run.
- Scales up to large documents -- my test document is a book! -- for me sitting at home working on my 134 page book, the time from making a change and clicking "save" to when it appears in the preview pane in high resolution is less than 7 seconds.
Some advantages over https://www.sharelatex.com and https://www.writelatex.com/Disclaimer: I'm not an expert with either of the editors mentioned above, so I may be completely wrong that the following are advantages:
- This is free (unlimited collaborators, space right now) -- my main motivation is to increase usage of Sage
- Sagetex is fully supported
- Forward and inverse search: jump from point in .tex file to corresponding point in pdf and conversely (it seems the competition doesn't have this, but I bet they will implement it soon after they read this post)
- High quality png preview with customizable resolution
- Perfect quality embedded pdf view as well, if your browser supports embedded pdf's
- If you need a full xterm for some reason you have it: you can run arbitrary purpose programs on that command line. This means, you can download some data (file, website, database, experimental result files, use git), process them in the most general sense of computing, and generate those files or parts of it for your LaTeX document.
- It scales up to large documents more efficiently (in my limited tests), since I was pretty careful about using hashing tricks, parallel compute to generate png's, etc.
- A different synchronization implementation for multiple people editing the same file at once; the others lock the editor when the network drops, or reset the docuement when the connection comes back; in real life, network connections are often dropping...
- I put some effort into trying to make this latex editor work on iPad/Android, though you'll want to use a bluetooth keyboard since there are major issues with CodeMirror and touch still.
- I've put little work into properly dealing with multi-file LaTeX documents
- The error messages are not displayed embedded in the tex document (not sure I want this though).
- You must have a cloud.sagemath account (free) -- you can't just start editing without signing up.
- Single file download is limited to 12MB right now, so if your PDF is huge, you won't be able to just download it -- you can scp it anywhere though using the terminal.
Behind the ScenesAs a professional mathematician, I've spent 20 years using LaTeX, often enhanced with little Python scripts I write to automate the build process somewhat. Also, I've spent way too much time over the years just configuring and re-configuring forward and inverse search under Linux, OS X, and Windows with various editors and previewers.
All the new code I wrote to implement the LaTeX editor is client-side CoffeeScript, HTML, and CSS, which builds on the infrastructure I've developed over the last year (so, e.g., it can run bash scripts on remote linux machines, etc.). Here are some specific problems I confronted; none of the solutions are what I expected two weeks ago or first tried!
- Inverse and forward search: It is impossible to read mouse clicks, page location, or control the location of the pdf viewer plugin in some browsers, e.g., in Chrome. Thus only using a PDF plugin would make inverse and forward search completely impossible. Game over.
- It might be possible to modify pdf.js to support what is needed for inverse and forward search, but this might be really, really hard (for me). Plus the rendering quality of pdf.js on Chrome is terrible. Game over.
- My test document is this book's PDF, which is about 8MB in size. With PDF viewer plugins, every time the PDF file changes, the entire 8MB pdf file has to be transferred to the browser, which just doesn't scale -- especially if you replace 8MB by 60MB (say). I want people to be able to write their books and Ph.D. theses using this editor. When editing a LaTeX document, the PDF file often changes only a little -- usually only a few pages changes and everything else remains identical; only the changes should get sent to the browser, so that even a 1000-page document could be efficiently edited. This sort of thing doesn't matter when working locally, but when working over the web it is critical.
- One substantial drawback to (1) for general PDF display is that there is no way to do full text search or copy text out of the PDF document. Neither of these drawback matters for the LaTeX editor application though, since you have the source file right there. Also, there's nothing stopping me from also providing the embedded PDF viewer, which has search and copy, and that's what I've done for cloud.sagemath.
- Another potential drawback of (1) is that it takes a long time to generate jpg or png images for a large pdf file -- 5 pages is fine, but what about 150 pages? 1000 pages? I tried using ImageMagick and Ghostscript. ImageMagick is way too slow to be useful for this. Ghostscript is incredibly powerful for this, and has a wide range of parameters, with numerous different rendering devices. The solution I choose here is to: (1) generate a high quality PNG image just for the currently visible pages (and +/-1), then (2) generate medium quality pages in some neighborhood of the visible pages, then (3) generate low quality PNG's for all the other pages. All this is done in parallel, since the host VM's have many cores. Also, we compute the sha1 hashes of the previews, and if the browser already has them, don't bother to update those images. Finally, it turns out to be important to replace high quality images by lower quality ones as the user scrolls through the document, since otherwise the browser can end up using too much memory. A useful trick for the high quality pages is using ghostscript's downsampling feature, so the PDF is rendered at 600dpi (say) in memory, but output at 200dpi to the PNG.
Summary: It is critical to realize exactly what problem we're trying to solve, which is viewing a PDF that is often changing locally. This is completely different than the general problem of viewing a static PDF, or editing a PDF itself, or even annotating one.
Problem: how to implement forward and inverse search in the browserForward and inverse search let you easily jump back and forth between a point in the source tex file and the corresponding point in the rendered PDF preview. You need this because editing LaTeX documents is not WYSIWYG (unless you are using something like Lyx or Texmacs), and without this feature you might find yourself constantly being lost, doing fulltext search through the source of pdf file, etc., and generally wasting a lot of effort on something that should be automatic. The first time I used inverse and forward search was around 2004 with the Winedt and TexShop editors, which I think (at the time) used various heuristics to implement them, since they often didn't quite work right. I 100% assumed that I would have to do use heuristics for cloud.sagemath, and started working on a heuristic approach based on pdftotext, page percentages, etc.
Then one morning I searched and learned about synctex, which was "recently" added to the core of pdflatex. The first thing I did was run it, look at the output file and try to parse with my eyes -- that didn't work. I then searched everywhere and could not find any documentation about the format of the synctex files; however, I found a paper by the author of synctex and read straight through it. In that paper, they mention that they provide a C library and C program to parse the synctex files, and explicitly don't document the format since they don't want anybody to write programs to parse it, since they reserve the right to significantly change it. No problem -- so I just call out to the shell and run the synctex program itself with appropriate options. With a little research into scaling factors, etc., I'm able to map mouse clicks on the png to the data synctex needs to get the corresponding location in the source file. This is all actually pretty easy and provides forward and inverse search with absolutely no hacks or heuristics. Also, forward search works well since using PNG's to display the preview means one can precisely set the preview location.
The log file also says when to run sagetex and bibtex, and whether or not to run pdflatex again to update cross references, and cloud parses that and automatically runs those tools. For some reason, sagetex doesn't say "run me again" even though it should when you update existing blocks, and then you have to do it manually by clicking a button.
Summary: I hope this LaTeX editor in the Sagemath Cloud is useful to people who just want to edit tex documents, play around with sagetex, and not have to worry about configuring anything. Implementing it was fun and interesting. If you have any questions about the technical details, please ask! Enjoy.